AI agent built for prediction,
not guesswork.

Tell it what you want to predict. It learns from the rows you have already judged, scores every remaining one, and puts a confidence figure on each. In chat, or as a tool your agents call.

predictivelayer connected
tracked_companies.csv 4,012 rows
I will treat those 84 owners as your examples of someone who sold, and score everyone else against them. Two things before I start. Does a sale to a strategic buyer count the same as a sale to a fund? And is there a size you stop caring below?
Read your list 4,012 companies, 84 marked sold
Kept the ones in range 3,180 with 20 staff or more
Found what the 84 had in common owner age, years held, flat headcount
Scored everyone else 3,096 companies in 7.4s
tracked_companies_scored.csvsorted by sell intent
companyowner ageyears heldstaffstate sell intentconfidence
Northwind Mechanical632741OH high0.92
Kestrel Heating673124PA high0.81
Orchard Climate592263NC high0.64
Vantage Air4512130FL low0.90
Aster Plumbing Co38688TX low0.87
Download CSVYour original rows, untouched. Two columns added.
214 companies score above 0.80. That is your call list for the quarter. Ask me why any one of them scored the way it did, or tell me I got one wrong and I will take it into account.
Ask for a prediction

How it works

Ask once. Every row scored.

You bring the judgement. It handles everything between the question and the answer.

01

Show it what good looks like

A handful of rows you have already judged. Fifty is often enough. That is your criterion, not a setting in a dropdown.

02

Ask in plain English

"Score these for fit." In chat, or as a tool call from your own agent. No column mapping, no config file.

03

Get every row back, scored

With a confidence figure on each one, so you know which rows to trust and which to check. Download it or pipe it onward.

The model

No training run, no tuning

Under the hood is a tabular foundation model, pre-trained on millions of synthetic tables. It already knows how columns tend to relate, so your examples go in as context rather than as a training set.

A prediction takes seconds instead of a sprint, and you can change your criteria and run it again without starting over.

See a full run →

Your criteria, not a fixed schema

Lead fit, risk flags, churn, priority, a quality grade. If you can label 50 rows, you can predict the rest.

Works on plain CSVs

Numbers, text categories, missing values. Columns are matched between the two files for you.

Runs on your machine

The app runs locally on a laptop CPU. Your data does not have to leave your network.

Where it fits

Anything you can label

Lead and account scoring

Label the accounts that closed. Score the rest of the list against the same bar.

Churn and renewal risk

Label who left and who stayed. Flag the accounts heading the same way.

Review triage

Label the cases that needed a look. Rank the queue by how likely each one is to matter.

Data quality flags

Label the rows you know are wrong. Find the ones that look like them.

Category fill-in

Tag part of a catalogue by hand. Let the model finish the rest.

Estimates and grades

Continuous targets work too: price, duration, a numeric quality score.

Try it on your own data

Tell us what you want to score and we will get you set up.

Get in touch